There isn't a big difference between the thumbsticks of different controllers like there is with motion controls, but that's besides the point. So by your logic everyone would have to buy the gamecube version and take out their Gamecubes and Wiis to play it if they want 'the true RE4 experience.' And when you think about it a Dual Shock 3/360 controller isn't necessarily the same as a Gamecube controller.

Why should people be forced to play with a controller when the game has had the option to use motion controls. To be happy they took out an OPTION that many people enjoyed and can be enhanced with a more precise version of the motion controls is odd. I understand that you may not want to use motion controls but it is only an option that wouldn't effect you if you wanted to use a controller. The Wii version is the definitive version. I don't know of many T or M rated games, aside from Call of Duty, that have 'casual' single player - that's with or without motion controls. So by your logic everyone would have to buy the gamecube version and take out their Gamecubes and Wiis to play it if they want 'the true RE4 said: Resident Evil 4 with Wii motion control is arguably the best way to play the game. Of course, if someone absolutely adores motion controls, their opinion will be different.

Also, I played the original Gamecube version to death, and to me that's the way people should experience the game. I understand the novelty of it, but the precision loss is too frustrating for me. Without that excellent precision a thumbstick offers, any shooter game becomes inferior when it's played with motion controls. I don't think motion controls can be quite as precise as thumbsticks.

Said: Resident Evil 4 with Wii motion control is arguably the best way to play the game.

Resident evil 4 ps3